Sunday, October 16, 2011

F11: Book Review - The Rape of Nanking


            The book under examination for this review is The Rape of Nanking written by Iris Chang. Before Chang’s untimely death she wrote three prolific novels over the span of her adult life including Thread of the Silkworm and The Chinese in America. The choice for this non-fiction work was made based on the fact that unlike the rest of Chang’s work, this one presents the most controversy and significance. The work depicts the events of Japanese soldiers that invaded and destroyed the physical and psychological being of the Chinese people in Nanking and the cover up attempted by Imperial Japan afterwards. Their vicious attacks laid waste to over three hundred thousand people, a death count exceeding that of both atomic bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined. Chang’s book has met much criticism from scholars and historians who say she embellishes and misinforms her readers. This review will summarize the proceedings depicted within the text to identify the truth and falsehood.
            The book follows the succession of Japanese soldiers and their path through Nanking by way of eyewitness accounts and memoirs. The soldiers tore through the city where they systematically killed soldiers and civilians they claimed were soldiers masquerading as civilians and raped women and took them as sex slaves. For weeks the men and women of Nanking were drenched in fear and anguish under the raid of the Imperial Japanese army. During the Rape there were foreigners who created neutral safety zones for the refuges being persecuted. They included a businessman, surgeon and educator who work tirelessly working with no assistance to keep Japanese soldiers at bay.
            After three hundred thousand deaths and the end of the Second World War, the Japanese retreated back to their homeland where most faced criminal war crimes. Chang discusses how the immunity of the Emperor of Japan led to the cover-up of the Nanking incident. She warns the dangers of unchecked power and ignoring genocide. Those who had fought so bravely against the Japanese to this day have not been compensated, nor have the Japanese issued a formal apology. Chang tries to paint a gruesomely detailed picture of the incident to inform a caution to an occurrence like this happening again and to attempt to have the Chinese recognized in a war that has only highlighted the plight of Jewish people in Europe.
            The book is divided into three major perspectives: that of Japanese soldiers, Chinese civilians and Westerners that occupied Nanking at the time. Most know of the massacre that happened in Europe between the Germans and Jewish people known as the holocaust but few know of Nanking. Though Chang never directly compares the two it can be gathered that this was China’s holocaust, if not worse. Chinese refugees reported others being hung by their tongues, dug into the earth and left to be eaten by dogs, starved to death until they dropped dead, husbands were forced to rape wives and children, civilians were used as bayonet practice and much more. One unlikely hero of Nanking stemmed from that of a Nazi soldier.
            John Rabe was a German businessman who proclaimed himself part of the Nazi party but aligned more with its socialist beliefs than its anti-Semitism. Chang retrieved Rabe’s memoirs, which showcased his protection of the Chinese in Nanking. Chang likens Rabe as the “Oskar Schindler of China” and at a point he even called off bombing raids by way of Adolf Hitler himself.
            The Japanese were not all monsters during the invasion of Nanking, however. Matsui Iwana, the leader of the Japanese troops during the invasion was too ill to continue the invasion and handed powers over to his unprepared successor, Asaka Yauhiko. When Iwana found out about the carnage that took place in Nanking he attempted to tell other military leaders that action needed to be taken against the Japanese soldiers in Nanking including Yasuhiko. After the war, Iwana was charged with war crimes, which he did not commit because he was sick and away from the city. He did take responsibility for Yauhiko’s actions and was thus executed.
            Chang faults the Japanese over years of their government’s leadership and education of its young men. She states that their identity to the samurai, who believed that to die for their emperor was the greatest honor continued through to the Second World War where they had a similar mentality. Toyshops in Japan were filled with weapon-toys as well as schools that convinced its young men that expansion to the west was the right thing to do, much like Manifest Destiny in that of America. Chang also faults the Japanese military for not having a check and balance system within its ranks that could have ended the mayhem before it got three hundred thousand people out of hand. She spends extensive time discussing the way in which the soldiers raped the refugees including how the soldiers forced fathers to rape dead wives, brothers rape sisters, sons rape mothers and other combinations.
            In conclusion, The Rape of Nanking is a graphic and difficult piece of non-fiction to swallow but it’s a slap in the face the world needs to read. Genocide still happens in the present and the lessons of this book relate to today’s world as well. It takes uncommon heroes to make a difference and it takes good leaders to prevent such acts. This book is the most criticized of Chang’s work for its exaggeration of the incident; however, it was the story that needed to be told. She made sure the forgotten Holocaust of World War II would never be forgotten.

No comments:

Post a Comment